By Naomi Lim
Washington Examiner
February 19, 2018
Political pundits have savaged a New York magazine article re-litigating the case for Supreme Court associate justice Clarence Thomas’ impeachment, which purportedly cites new evidence Thomas lied under oath about Anita Hill during his confirmation hearing.
The National Review published a five-part series Monday in response to former New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson’s piece in New York on Sunday.